Saturday, February 11, 2012

Deferred Gratification and Teen Fantasy Fodder

Yesterday morning Slave was up early, and after publishing the daily edition, made his way up to the Executive suite with the expectation that .... I'd get lucky. Well, after some worship and blog reading, that is.

But when I arrived upstairs I found Mistress with her lap top open, engrossed in .... something.  I decided to be a little flip.

"Start without me Mistress?"

(Sometimes Mistress reaches under the bed for her favorite power tool.)

She was not amused.

It seemed that some sort of work crisis had popped up on her email stream and she was already deep into it.

Oops. My window of opportunity had slammed shut. And while Mistress was amenable to a quicky worship session as she read the morning edition, she was quickly up and into the shower thereafter.

The crisis was averted later that morning (Lesson: don't open your work email at 6:15 am), and by late afternoon Slave was looking forward to a relaxed evening at home starting off with some R & R time in bed before proceeding to a "picnic" dinner and maybe a movie.

But.... surprise.... the cute Co-Ed had gotten a ride home for the weekend with a friend - she missed her cats, her bed, the larder and (possibly) her parents.

Now of course it was good to see her (had it been a whole 2 weeks?) but her presence certainly altered our plans. There was no "right when we get home from work" sex. But instead, Slave reheated the chili left over from Super Sunday, cooked some rice to go with it, opened some wine, and we settled in to watch a chick flick as a family unit. (My suggestion of the X-Men Prequel we sadly had missed at the Multiplex last summer went over like a kryptonite balloon).

Finally, when the couple who met cute at the beginning found themselves together at last at the end, movie time was over and Mistress and Slave had a good excuse to go to bed.  By then it had been almost 36 hours since Slave's last opportunity -- yeah, I know some of you guys are feeling for me - and I was just a tad horny, despite a glass or two of robust red.

We closed the door, leaving the cute Co-Ed to play with her cats, and stripped away the day's costumes.

"Do you mind if I keep the tights on Slave..... it's a little cold tonight."

"No problem Mistress..... You know how hot I think they are...."

"And go insert your device.... I want the extra hard cock tonight."

She got no argument from me.

_________________________

Last week, when I was pointing out that the seemingly boring housewives of the 1950's might have been closet dommes, I concluded with a reference to Wonder Woman, who may have been the inspiration for some closeted male subs of that generation.  I know I thought she was pretty hot, what with the mind controlling lasso and all.

One of our readers left a comment to the effect that in her early days there was an even headier D/s theme to her work, so I did a little searching on the internet to confirm that proposition, and sure enough found some goodies, but some of the photos suggested that the writers and artists considered Wonder Woman to be into a little girl on girl action, something that has been subtly brewing over at All Mine in recent weeks.

Here is another one:


And some others:

And while there are plenty of old Wonder Woman covers showing her at the mercy of some male or female villians, what I couldn't find were any illustrations of Wonder Woman dominating men with her lasso or other bondage implements.... not even her wimpy boy friend Steve Rogers.

What's with that? Maybe our readers can help me find some.

3 comments:

  1. As do most male personnel who live on this end of the leash (come to think of it, most male personnel anyhow), Wonder Woman's creator was not adverse to girl-on-girl. He was married, also had a steady girlfriend, and the two women knew and liked each other (although don't have any reason to believe "liked" went as far as our lurid imaginations are going right now). He created Wonder Woman explicitly to show women could be powerful and superheroic, since comic books were mostly a children's medium the idea was to get that idea into people early in their lives. . Part of the schtick of the character was (still is) that if someone was ensnared by Diana's lasso they were magically compelled to answer questions truthfully, the bondage aspects of the lasso (in the sense we have them) were there but since these were, after all, superhero adventures, that was secondary to the plot of catching bad guys and interrogating them through the lasso to track down the major bad guys. Certainly the girl-on-girl dominance/submission - such as in the clips you've provided - in addition to advancing the superhero-catch-the-bad-guys plots, was manifestly promoting his philosophy that it was acceptable for a woman to submit to another woman but not to a man. That was also part of the character's schtick: to remind the Amazons of the danger of male dominance, the Greek deities - who granted Diana with the superpowers that make her Wonder Woman - decreed that if the magic bracelets she wears are fastened together by a man then her superpowers don't work and she can be dominated by that man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Love the detailed comment , Ravensron. Thanks, Mick

      Delete
  2. Thirty-six hours? You expect most of your readers to believe that???
    C'mon man!!!!!!

    The Girl-on-girl action is just simmering....not quite brewing yet :)

    Love,

    Suzanne

    ReplyDelete

We Love your comments.... please join in: