Saturday, August 4, 2012

Friday Night at the Movies

Mistress and Slave were determined to have a relazing Friday night, on our own schedules last night, despite the fact that our sullen teen would be skulking about.  When we got home and she wanted to know "what's for dinner" we gently explained that her parents would be having a self-made "picnic" while watching a movie, and she might want to consider fending for herself.

There was the usual whining about there being nothing suitable to eat in our wretched home (she should have seen the yurt!) for her delicate vegetarian sensibilities, but we noted that we had just visited the local market and picked up some fresh fruit, veggies, cheeses and bread.

She seemed to survive this harrowing abandonment for the evening.

Meantime, Mistress and Slave went about their business, doing our best not to feel too guilty.

Slave fell to his knees for some pre-bike ride worship, salving Mistress's clean shaven folds with my devoted lips and tongue.

Then a pre-dusk ride in the sultry summer heat.

After the ride, a cooling shower together, which led to some earnest fucking once we were dry and back to our bed.

A short nap.

Then our picnic dinner together on the couch as we watched an Indie flick "Take this Waltz", which opened recently but is doing the simultaneous in Pay Per View route to distribution. Here's the Trailer.

It's a clever, funny, pretty film, set in Toronto, a place I've only been once. It made me want to visit again, to check out the funky neigborhoods and beach scene it portrays. (Though I also tend to think of Toronto as the place where James Earle Ray hing out after killing MLK.)

And it has a quirky plot about a 20 something wife who falls hard in lust for the hot guy across the street and struggles with the dueling compulsions of her "plight". You wanted to shake her and say, "honey, just ask your husband for permission.... he might actually like it!"

Speaking of which..... Mistress has an early morning "appointment" today, over at J's "love shack". A long bike ride followed by some time in the sack, no doubt.  Slave will be busy entertaining my grandsons and visiting my grumpy mother.

With this early curtain call, Slave may not get his usual Saturday AM "wake up" sex.... Maybe I'll have to settle for "sloppy seconds" this afternoon?

Finally, in the spirit of potential cuckolds gone awry, fellow blogger Harry Haversackers passed on the following cautionary tale from the Canadian Press. Here's the link . So one more thing to put on the DON'T list:

Don't send naked photos of your wife, who happens to be a Judge, to a former client in hopes he might want to have sex with her!  He just might report you to the Bar Association. Or try to blackmail you!

Thanks for the tip, Harry!


6 comments:

  1. Lots of Canadian content here this morning!

    There's clearly a lesson in the case of the judge's pics about not interacting with legal clients. Was the other man consenting/discussing or just always in it for the blackmail? Don't know. He did think he could blackmail them for millions - NOT a nice guy.

    -sin

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes never a good idea.........

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not a very good way to get the cuckolding thing going eh? Mon Dieu!

    The has better ways to go about it,

    Suzanne

    ReplyDelete
  4. Glad to hear that you found the article interesting, Mick. There's an added bit of information that I noticed isn't mentioned in this particular update, that will excite internet porn lovers everywhere: Mr. Chapman, the dude the judge's husband wanted to seduce her, is black. It seems that the husband was obsessed with interracial nookie. No mention has been made in the news as to the size of his...

    Sin... Scumbags abound in this case... The fellow who claims to have been sexually harassed reneged on an earlier deal, in which he agreed (for $25,000) to keep his mouth shut and return all the nude photos of the judge, and sued for $67 million. That was drop-kicked out of court. He's since been ordered to return the $25K, and is now being sued because he didn't return all the pics (claims he kept them as "insurance"). I'm not sure who is slimier here, the husband or the "other man".

    ReplyDelete
  5. $67 million is a LOT of money to sue for. Mr. Chapman must have been extremely shocked and traumatized by the nasty suggestion.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mick

    I have to say I can't believe you publish such interesting things every day

    My hat is off to you my friend,

    The ever lazy,

    WC

    ReplyDelete

We Love your comments.... please join in: