Mistress and Slave had one of those priceless empty nest evenings last night. We both snuck out of work a little earlier, found our ways home and then took a nice bike ride on our hills and valleys before thunderstorms moved into the neighborhood.
Mistress had to leave the house early this AM, so there was a little pent-up sexual demand here in the executive suite to discharge before we settled into a little pre-dinner nap.
But when we woke, and before Slave grilled some chicken for dinner, Slave brought up the subject of the morning's blog and Suzanne's comment, bringing up her frequent theme in recent weeks.
"She's right, Slave.... maybe you do need more cage time. And since I'm staying home tomorrow, it seems like a good time to start."
So Slave's up this AM, with that tight metal ring already seated at the base of my cock and balls. At least there will be time for some wake-up six here before Slave goes into "lock-down" for the day.
Who says we don't pay attention to reader feedback?
Speaking of "lockdown", it's a little scary watching the news coverage from Boston this AM. We wish all of you well there, and hope you can hunker down and wait until the bad guys are off the streets.
The word is "shelter in place". So Stay home. Sleep in. Have sex. Peruse the sex blogs. Let the professionals do their jobs.
Friday, April 19, 2013
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Cuckolding meets Marketing
"I'll see if there's a spark Slave. Then come over for some worship."
Now that's a plan.
When she did show up, I was buttoning down my brief (so to speak), and she had some interesting news.
"He works for that company involved in that controversial ******* deal. Slave! We spent a lot of time talking about that and the local politicians and judges involved in it."
As it turns out the brief was was slaving away on was directly on point - something I was working on for a local political committee with a point of view on the subject. And their POV was aligned with Mistress's "date's" employer.
I quickly had Mistress settled into her "throne", and she wriggled out of her black undies. Tights season is long over here in the heartland. Soon she was focused on the tongue plying her clean shaven folds, and it seemed she enjoyed my devotions.
Once my work down there was done, I asked for her verdict on the guy we will call "Mr. Naptown".
"Not so sure Slave. He's a little boring. I told him that I would charge a lot of people for all the information I was sharing."
"Actually, it sounds like this guys company could use what you normally sell, Mistress."
"Don't think I wasn't thinking exactly that, Slave."
So while drinks with Mr. Naptown may not have turned into anything hot in the "between the sheets" category, it may be his employer could be a hot prospect for Mistress.
Who needs Linked-In when you have Ashley Madison?
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Another Boom
The odd coincidence was that Slave was emailing with our competition over at All Mine when news broke about the Marathon bombing in Suzanne's neck of the woods.
One minute we were comparing theories on the potential compatibility of Shane, "The Witchita Lineman", and Mistress.
The next minute she was assuring me that both Tammy and Jay were well and accounted for. Thankfully.
But that wasn't true for her historic City and the victims of yet another senseless act of violence.
Of course, if you've been around as long as me, you know where things are headed when news like this breaks. The media rounds up the usual "experts" to toss out their speculations about what happened and why, the networks' glamor boys and girls hop on the private jets and line the sidewalks at the scene of the tragedy for their stand-up shots, preening in their "crime scene casual" wear, angling for ratings advantage. The pundits begin an endless round of speculation about who's to blame and the political calculus. Meanwhile the doctors and cops quietly try to do their jobs under the harsh, prying media microscope.
We've seen it so many times.
The Laguardia bombing in the 1970's, The Atlanta Olympic Bombing, Oklahoma City, the mass shootings at Virginia Tech, Columbine, Connecticut, and of course the mother of all horrors, 9/11/2001.
Our reaction to that unimaginable act of terror led us blundering into Iraq and Afghanistan, and left a death toll that far exceeded the original tragedy. It also left us shoeless at the airport, droning our adversaries and the innocents around them, and wondering whether the emails we send and phone calls we make are being dumped in some gigantic government data base.
The frenzy, fueled by social media and all those TV news outlets, make us believe we live in a dangerous time and place. They crank up fear, and foster crazy, whether the urge for some act of "eye for an eye" vengeance, or to turn the screws of "security" down another notch, further jeopardizing the freedoms we value.
But when you think about it, we live in relatively safe and stable times, at least those of us who live here in the USA, or in the "developed" world. We don't need to worry about the threats our ancestors faced in a world without today's medical science and technology: deadly influenza epidemics, "consumption", the wars of the 19th and 20th centuries that left millions dead. Even the aircraft crashes that left hundreds dead that were far more typical in the 1970's and 1980's. Mistress and Slave were both at a Who concert years ago where the death toll from a stampede for seats far exceeded yesterday's tragedy.
But these random, unexpected acts of violence like yesterday in Boston, particularly when amplified by the media frenzy, unnerve us all. They make us think twice about whether we can safely walk our streets, or attend the types of events - like the Marathon - that make our communities come together.
Let's hope that the survivors and their families are given the space and care required to recover as best they can.
Let's hope that they quickly find the perpetrators and make sure they can't do this again.
But let's also hope that our collective reaction to this horror does not once again disproportionately ratchet up the fear, the death and the "security" measures that diminish us.
One minute we were comparing theories on the potential compatibility of Shane, "The Witchita Lineman", and Mistress.
The next minute she was assuring me that both Tammy and Jay were well and accounted for. Thankfully.
But that wasn't true for her historic City and the victims of yet another senseless act of violence.
Of course, if you've been around as long as me, you know where things are headed when news like this breaks. The media rounds up the usual "experts" to toss out their speculations about what happened and why, the networks' glamor boys and girls hop on the private jets and line the sidewalks at the scene of the tragedy for their stand-up shots, preening in their "crime scene casual" wear, angling for ratings advantage. The pundits begin an endless round of speculation about who's to blame and the political calculus. Meanwhile the doctors and cops quietly try to do their jobs under the harsh, prying media microscope.
We've seen it so many times.
The Laguardia bombing in the 1970's, The Atlanta Olympic Bombing, Oklahoma City, the mass shootings at Virginia Tech, Columbine, Connecticut, and of course the mother of all horrors, 9/11/2001.
Our reaction to that unimaginable act of terror led us blundering into Iraq and Afghanistan, and left a death toll that far exceeded the original tragedy. It also left us shoeless at the airport, droning our adversaries and the innocents around them, and wondering whether the emails we send and phone calls we make are being dumped in some gigantic government data base.
The frenzy, fueled by social media and all those TV news outlets, make us believe we live in a dangerous time and place. They crank up fear, and foster crazy, whether the urge for some act of "eye for an eye" vengeance, or to turn the screws of "security" down another notch, further jeopardizing the freedoms we value.
But when you think about it, we live in relatively safe and stable times, at least those of us who live here in the USA, or in the "developed" world. We don't need to worry about the threats our ancestors faced in a world without today's medical science and technology: deadly influenza epidemics, "consumption", the wars of the 19th and 20th centuries that left millions dead. Even the aircraft crashes that left hundreds dead that were far more typical in the 1970's and 1980's. Mistress and Slave were both at a Who concert years ago where the death toll from a stampede for seats far exceeded yesterday's tragedy.
But these random, unexpected acts of violence like yesterday in Boston, particularly when amplified by the media frenzy, unnerve us all. They make us think twice about whether we can safely walk our streets, or attend the types of events - like the Marathon - that make our communities come together.
Let's hope that the survivors and their families are given the space and care required to recover as best they can.
Let's hope that they quickly find the perpetrators and make sure they can't do this again.
But let's also hope that our collective reaction to this horror does not once again disproportionately ratchet up the fear, the death and the "security" measures that diminish us.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Mistress and Slave Meet the Swingers
With her afternoon delight with Mr. Leprecock behind her on friday, you couldn't blame Mistress if she called it a night, and retreated with her pampered house Slave to the UCTMW World HQ for a little R & R.
But as it turns out, she had arranged to meet a "gentleman" and his wife at a local downtown bar with her Slave in tow.
This was another guy who contacted her via AM. He noticed the part in Mistress's profile that says her husband is clued in on her extracurricular activities, and told her that he and his wife have a similar arrangement: but (unlike Slave) they both "play the field". They talked on the phone the other night, and Mistress was intrigued enough by some of his stories that it seemed like a four way meet up might be entertaining.
Now this guy really isn't Mistress's "type". He is more working class hero than over educated "professional". He works for the local public utility, and we have started calling him the "Witchita Lineman" after that old Glen Campbell song. We met him and his wife at a local sports bar he suggested, one of those places with wall to wall big screen TVs with Masters' highlights and the local baseball team clogging the plasma.
(Of course, Mistress had a crash course on Masters highlights earlier in the afternoon, so she now was well aware of what a "leader board" was. She knew that numbers like 5+ did not reference cock size).
Shane and Bridget are both in their early 40's, and we got to know them over some unhealthy food, Guinness for me and a Chardonnay for Mistress.
We all shared some funny stories about our sexual adventures over the last few years. They've worked the local "swinger" scene, and we told them about our trip to the downriver dungeon with Aisha. Mistress even shared the fact that her boredom at work that Friday had led her on a frolic and detour to the home of Mr. Leprecock only a few hours earlier.
Bridgett was tall and fairly attractive, but with a laugh that was a little scary, and made Slave want to suppress his trademark humor about half-way through our conversation. But when they told a story about she and a female friend getting it on with a strap-on at one of their "parties", I must say the thought of her buried between Mistress's legs piqued my prurient interest.
What became clear was that while both of them are free to indulge, Bridgett's been getting a lot more action than Shane, and Shane is not the type, like some of us out there, who necessarily gets off on the whole cuckold thing.
Shane was clearly interested in the lovely Molly, and moving this little party somewhere more private where he might be able to slide her out of her panties.
"If we didn't have a kid and babysitter over at our house, I'd invite you home with us right now."
Of course we had an empty nest, but I didn't notice Mistress suggesting that we adjourn there.
On the way home, Mistress acknowledged what was pretty obvious from the start. Shane was not the type of guy she would want to bed. A little too short. A little too goofy. Rough edges in the wrong places. But how to tell that to a perfectly nice guy we had a pleasant and entertaining evening with?
"If I did it it would be a sympathy fuck, Slave... I kind of feel bad that she's getting so much more action than he is...."
"I think you're beyond sympathy fucks, Mistress....."
On the other hand, we had fun with them as 2 couples sharing funny stories about our in-common kinks in a way we can never do with the boring folks we normally socialize with. That's good isn't it?
When we got home, there was the predictable text from Shane, raving about how sexy he thought Mistress was, and wondering when they might get together again.... "how about tomorrow night.... LOL."
(Did I ever mention that Mistress wonders about guys who use LOL in the communications?)
So do we invite them over for a fun dinner at our house some night, while making it clear that this is not a door opener for Shane to get it on with Mistress? Or do we simply cut things off all together?
Any thoughts, dear readers?
But as it turns out, she had arranged to meet a "gentleman" and his wife at a local downtown bar with her Slave in tow.
This was another guy who contacted her via AM. He noticed the part in Mistress's profile that says her husband is clued in on her extracurricular activities, and told her that he and his wife have a similar arrangement: but (unlike Slave) they both "play the field". They talked on the phone the other night, and Mistress was intrigued enough by some of his stories that it seemed like a four way meet up might be entertaining.
Now this guy really isn't Mistress's "type". He is more working class hero than over educated "professional". He works for the local public utility, and we have started calling him the "Witchita Lineman" after that old Glen Campbell song. We met him and his wife at a local sports bar he suggested, one of those places with wall to wall big screen TVs with Masters' highlights and the local baseball team clogging the plasma.
(Of course, Mistress had a crash course on Masters highlights earlier in the afternoon, so she now was well aware of what a "leader board" was. She knew that numbers like 5+ did not reference cock size).
Shane and Bridget are both in their early 40's, and we got to know them over some unhealthy food, Guinness for me and a Chardonnay for Mistress.
We all shared some funny stories about our sexual adventures over the last few years. They've worked the local "swinger" scene, and we told them about our trip to the downriver dungeon with Aisha. Mistress even shared the fact that her boredom at work that Friday had led her on a frolic and detour to the home of Mr. Leprecock only a few hours earlier.
Bridgett was tall and fairly attractive, but with a laugh that was a little scary, and made Slave want to suppress his trademark humor about half-way through our conversation. But when they told a story about she and a female friend getting it on with a strap-on at one of their "parties", I must say the thought of her buried between Mistress's legs piqued my prurient interest.
What became clear was that while both of them are free to indulge, Bridgett's been getting a lot more action than Shane, and Shane is not the type, like some of us out there, who necessarily gets off on the whole cuckold thing.
Shane was clearly interested in the lovely Molly, and moving this little party somewhere more private where he might be able to slide her out of her panties.
"If we didn't have a kid and babysitter over at our house, I'd invite you home with us right now."
Of course we had an empty nest, but I didn't notice Mistress suggesting that we adjourn there.
On the way home, Mistress acknowledged what was pretty obvious from the start. Shane was not the type of guy she would want to bed. A little too short. A little too goofy. Rough edges in the wrong places. But how to tell that to a perfectly nice guy we had a pleasant and entertaining evening with?
"If I did it it would be a sympathy fuck, Slave... I kind of feel bad that she's getting so much more action than he is...."
"I think you're beyond sympathy fucks, Mistress....."
On the other hand, we had fun with them as 2 couples sharing funny stories about our in-common kinks in a way we can never do with the boring folks we normally socialize with. That's good isn't it?
When we got home, there was the predictable text from Shane, raving about how sexy he thought Mistress was, and wondering when they might get together again.... "how about tomorrow night.... LOL."
(Did I ever mention that Mistress wonders about guys who use LOL in the communications?)
So do we invite them over for a fun dinner at our house some night, while making it clear that this is not a door opener for Shane to get it on with Mistress? Or do we simply cut things off all together?
Any thoughts, dear readers?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)