Hello dear readers…it has been a while. In a bout of insomnia (from paradise) I
nudged Mick and said, “I will write the blog today.” While my written energy would be more appropriately directed
to my clients – this seemed more in line with what (while we are here) has
become the daily exercise in determining just how much paid work we can avoid.
As we approach year five of the contract and the
blog, one thinks about why we do this – the short answer is that we like
sex. The longer answer gets a bit more complicated, which is
likely why it is so difficult to find the “right” person to be part of this
“triangle.” We miss the team over
at “All Mine.” They have had what
has seemed to be a perfect situation.
Yet we all know that while relationships with two can be a challenge –
three is in a league of its own.
Suzanne once told us that she and Tammy had met many
suitors and had all but given up, until Jay came into the picture. We wish them all well and are hopeful
that their unique situation prospers.
And then there was the WC – our friend – and
potential “partner” from the Rocky Mountain West. We love you WC – and respect that your personal situation
does not lend itself to what Mick would call our “hijinks”.
Otherwise, we have had a trail of albeit interesting
– but not the perfect suitors.
Yes, we have met some great men.
Yes, I have had some mind blowing sex – but regarding one’s decision to
be part of our lives – has not happened.
Marc D: why are you so far away? We could work
something out.
So today we sit on the precipice of someone whom we
plan to get to know a bit. While
he is reading, he has not commented.
In (what I have deemed our final attempt) to use AM as a suitor location
vehicle – he was able to connect the dots …find the blog and figure some things
out about us. At the same time that we connected with “D,” I also interviewed
some suitors – call it pheromones – but several are fairly insistent – and I
have sent some pretty specific “not interested” messages to them .
What I don’t want:
1)
An affair because your wife has not slept with you for six years.
2)
A booty call at 6:00 am in the morning (that is when I have sex with
Mick, exercise, play on the internet, and pet my cats.) No thanks.
3)
To hear about your horrible divorce – while I am sort of a psychologist
– not looking to be your counselor.
4)
To go with you to Europe (while I love Europe), I don’t know you yet, and
am not impressed that (over dinner) you ask me to join you on a trip and then you send me the travel
itinerary the next day. Makes me wonder….
What we do want:
1) Someone who has the patience
for us. We move fast. We are sarcastic. We like sex. We love
each other.
2) Someone who has fun with
this, but does not play games.
3) Someone who has a high
energy level – we do.
Remember Mick and Molly have sex at least once (sometimes twice per
day.) The only deviation is when we are in different cities. Those of you who
have been fans – know that when I am seeing someone – the count increases.
4) Someone who is smart, with a
sense of humor that does not take us (or themselves) too seriously.
5) Compliments – I will admit
this – I am 51 and want LOTS of them. I wish that I could be more cool about it
– but let’s face it—the glamour girl years may be fleeting – bring them on and
bring them now.
6) Someone who
communicates. Mick and I both are
high on the communications scale – while we prefer proper spelling and grammar
– we are willing to trade for other redeeming qualities. (WC is still our
buddy.)
D: you
may well be this guy – and if you are not – can you use your intelligence
gathering to find him for us?
The other option is for Mick and I to “mail” in our
retirement letters, wire cash to the kids and retire (out here) like most
people our age do.
Happy Wednesday to all.
Molly
WC here
ReplyDeleteThanks Molly....
Molly,
ReplyDeleteA nice break from hearing from the cuckold (no offense Mick). Distance does suck at ties, but I'd also have to "cheat" on Janice. What a dilemma that would put me in. Every couple I've been with laments how hard it is to "find the right person."
I don't have any evidence other than personal experience to support what I'm about to say but I've come to the conclusion that it's easier for someone like me to find someone like you guys, than it is someone like you guys to find someone like me?
Make sense?
And I like your requirements. With the exception of the spelling requirement they're all pretty reasonable. I mean not everyone is expected to know the proper spelling of various sexual terms are they?
MD
It's very nice of you to publish a "how to" manual. It's certainly one way of getting a little closer to what you want.
ReplyDeleteF
Thank you for sharing that Molly, most interesting to hear your thoughts, and a fun read. From following your blog for many years, I felt I had an insight into what your requirements were. Reading it, it all seems so very reasonable, but oh so difficult to pull off in the real world.
ReplyDelete