During the course of the week, our Senior Correspondent lost and then regained her internet connection. That means we're expecting some post from her in the not too distant future (hint! hint!).
We've received confirmation that the WC was a non-stop wanker, even back in middle school, and that Suzanne was already embracing her inner Domme at the expense of totally over-matched 7th grade boys while the Nuns were looking elsewhere.
Here in River City, Mistress and Slave have been going a little crazy over a 20 year old Co-Ed who seems to have not much to do other than hang around here in the evenings and cramp our sexually expansive style.
Tonight could be where that comes to a head.
Mistress and Slave are heading over to J's love shack for a long bike ride with him at the end of the work day. Afterwards.... well, it would certainly seem normal for Mistress to remain a little longer with him to enjoy a little of their "special" relationship, while Slave heads home. Either he could drop her off later tonight, or she could sleep over and return on the AM.
But what if the Co-Ed has no plans tonight?
"I could just go hang out somewhere, Mistress!"
"No you won't Slave.... you might get into 'trouble'".
AS if.
So what happens tonight (beyond a bike ride) may depend on whether the Co-Ed gets her cute little sorority girl ass up and out the door, or spends another evening watching videos with her kitties.
This brings to mind a post that Suzanne shared earlier this week from the Daily Beast entitled "Cuckolding: the Intellectual Sex Fetish". The author, who seems to have limited her research to some tacky web sites, calls cuckolding:
"S&M for Ph. D's: Cuckolding in which men watch their wives have sex with other guys, is catching on among people with high IQ's who revel in the psychological agony."
The article goes onto describe couples who engage some random "stud" to fuck the wife, with the guy watching and wanking, as the woman explains what a far superior lover this anonymous dude is compared to the pathetic cuck of a husband. The husband revels in the humiliation, but would be horrified if the stud and the wife did something like take a walk to an ice cream parlor together. Now THAT would be threatening.
Now Slave hardly thinks of himself as an intellectual, a word given a pejorative connotation back in the days of Adlai Stevenson and Joe McCarthy. But if you've been following us here, you know that what we've been up to does not involve me watching my wife have sex with other guys, while wanking. (Well I suppose there was that strange scene involving Francois and Didi and Mistress a few months back....but Slave waited for later!)
First off, neither J or Mistress would be comfortable with old Mick sitting back and enjoying their "show", with or without my cock in hand. Would she welcome a chance for us both to show her some physical attention in the same venue.... now that is another story, but J is probably not there yet. And may never be.
Nor do we see J as some anonymous "stud". AS Mistress says, "he's like having a new friend, Slave, but we get to fuck too!" They do enjoy each other's company, and are on the phone and text one another regularly.
It's really quite romantic!
Mistress says "it's like a little escape..."
And she deserves one, don't you think?
"So what's in it for Slave?", you might ask.
(Of course, Suzanne might say, at that question.... "who gives a rats ass, a good Slave lives to make his Mistress happy.... and she would be onto something.)
The Daily Beast article, and some other more thoughtful and researched pieces goes into it a bit. The notion of "healthy competition", or "sperm competition" may express it. When it is apparent that your wife is "hotly contested" there is a little extra thrill in the chase. Why shouldn't I, after more than 20 years with Mistress, have to compete a little for her attentions?
It does seem to heat things up in our bed. And of course, it makes her happy, reflates her self-esteem at a point in her life when that can't hurt, can it?
So, sad to report Daily Beast, you seem to be way off the mark, at least in our household.